REVIEW: Cinema Release: We Are What We Are
Film: We Are What We Are
Release date: 12th November 2010
Certificate: 15
Running time: 90 mins
Director: Jorge Michel Grau
Starring: Francisco Barreiro, Alan Chávez, Paulina Gaitán, Carmen Beato, Jorge Zárate
Genre: Drama/Horror
Studio: Artificial Eye
Format: Cinema
Country: Mexico
A far from palatable tale of cannibals from first-time Mexican director Jorge Michel Grau, who grounds his story in the realities of his country’s class system – perhaps a truth that’s even harder to digest than the uncooked portions of human flesh.
The patriarch of a family of cannibals passes away after being poisoned, most likely by a prostitute – his meat of choice despite the protests of his wife.
With little time before the family’s next feeding ritual, the outlook is bleak, and the mother seems to have given up on all hope of survival. It’s therefore left to the children to assume the household’s responsibilities, including hunting to put meat on the table.
The daughter, who believes the eldest brother’s sensitivity and restraint makes him the perfect candidate to lead the family, despite his reservations, hatches a plan for the two brothers to abduct a prostitute – an easy choice after a botched snatch attempt on a child – who will be dressed in her own clothes to fool their mother. However, after the mother interrupts them, ensuring their catch meets a grisly end, events begin to spiral out of control.
All the while, unbeknown to them, following a routine autopsy on their father, which turned up an unusual find, the police are now on red alert – the family’s turmoil set to gift them a lead their incompetence would never find…
As with Let The Right One In before it, the success of We Are What We Are lies in taking an age old horror fable and stripping away all the clichés which have built up through constant retelling. Removing the obvious scare tactics that audiences are now resistant to, and placing the ‘monsters’ in realistic and relatable scenarios, building empathy for them, and in many ways painting the ‘victims’ as the real beasts, as the lack of disgust and better understanding for their actions becomes far more unsettling for viewers.
Much of the film’s running time is spent with the family; a true character study of a mother and her three teenage children who are coping with the loss of a husband and father – and the household’s main provider. Their home is the picture of poverty – none of the home comforts we are used to in their bare, poorly lit abode – and the children, who, after all, have had no choice in this undesirable lifestyle are left in a state of limbo, forced to grow up earlier than expected as the mother at first becomes reclusive, seeing no hope for their future, and later becomes oppressive - particularly damning of her eldest son who feels it is his duty to take on the mantle of head of the household given his age, even if he doesn’t want to.
Eldest son Alfredo is at the heart of this film, and Francisco Barreiro gives a mesmerising performance, conveying the requisite pain, uncertainty and anguish which is so critical in ensuring the viewer does not turn against the family. Unlike his hot-headed and violent brother – who loses them the only thankless job they can get at the start of the film – Alfredo shows sensitivity and restraint, hesitant to use violence against their prey and in a constant state of inner turmoil, trying to keep his brother under control as his sister presses that he must now do his duty, whilst his mother constantly criticises and puts him down.
Outside of the home, their chosen prey are dirty prostitutes, the policeman on their case is a glory hunter, not above paedophilia, whilst an early scene, where the family’s father passes away in a fairly gruesome manner in public, shows how little society cares about the underclass’s in this Mexico. Spewing black bile from his mouth, his body is dragged away immediately, the area quickly cleaned up as life carries on as normal – his death going unnoticed by the passersby.
Whilst this is something of family drama, with plenty of biting social commentary to get under your skin, the director is just as unflinching when it comes to the violence; the sounds, arguably even more than the images during the feeding ritual, are particularly ghastly. The darkly lit, atmospheric production, undesirables on both sides, and hints at even more heinous crimes (thankfully the incestuous temptations of the younger siblings is not fully explored) just add to the audience’s apprehension throughout.
Unfortunately, the film doesn’t quite measure up to Let The Right One In. A few glaring plot holes as the film tries to deliver on thrills during the last twenty minutes spoils (as does a Hollywood-esque tying up of one of the loose ends), whilst you could say some of the humorous aspects do not sit well – the sweaty, vested pathologist who finds a whole finger perfectly intact inside the father’s stomach is a little too silly, given everything has been set up to be so real.
Even if it is loses its way somewhat towards the end, this is gripping and thought provoking stuff. Whilst you may not cheer them on, and you will find it hard to stomach some of the more gruesome aspects, you certainly don’t condemn them for their actions – a sympathetic pardon that makes this one of the scariest horror films for some time. DH
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment