Showing posts with label Pier Paolo Pasolini. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pier Paolo Pasolini. Show all posts

REVIEW: DVD Release: Mamma Roma























Film: Mamma Roma
Year of production: 1962
UK Release date: 25th April 2011
Distributor: Mr Bongo
Certificate: 15
Running time: 106 mins
Director: Pier Paolo Pasolini
Starring: Anna Magnani, Ettore Garofolo, Franco Citti, Silvana Corsini, Luisa Loiano
Genre: Drama
Format: DVD
Country of Production: Italy
Language: Italian

For some, the name of Pier Paolo Pasolini conjures up images from films such as Salo and Oedipus Rex, but his second feature, Mamma Roma, is beautiful, raw and poetic. Full of contradictions and imagery that can be read on many levels, it is a class tragedy that marked the end of Pasolini’s neorealist style.

We first meet Mamma Roma at the wedding of her pimp, ushering three pigs into the hall where the reception is taking place. She sings bawdy songs and cackles like a witch, but she is happy, for it marks the moment she is free to live her life with her son, a life away from prostitution.

Mamma Roma moves her son to Rome from the countryside to set up a market stall and start a new life, but her son, Ettore, is forming some unhealthy attachments to a local promiscuous girl, a group of thieves, and a fence for stolen goods.

In her many efforts to set Ettore on a path that will make him the man she wants him to be, Mamma Roma will stop at nothing, but her actions have tragic consequences…


Pier Paolo Pasolini has never been known for subtlety, as anyone who has seen Pigsty or Salo can testify, and Mamma Roma is no exception. The language is crude and colloquial, the shots of Rome show nothing of the city’s beauty and the characters are all deeply flawed. From the opening reception dinner and the entrance of Mamma Roma, escorting three pigs into the room where the diners are eating, it is clear that we are watching a richly layered film. The entrance of the pigs has significance not just in their presence at this particular wedding reception, but also their representation of Italy. Pasolini adds layers to the scene with close-ups of the bride and groom’s facial expressions throughout, juxtaposing them with the laughter from Mamma Roma and other guests. It gets more complex when we find out that the groom is a pimp, and Mamma Roma has, in that moment, been released from his service. The whole scene, complete with a singing exchange, is by turns funny, tense and uncomfortable, and we’re only five minutes in.

From there, we follow Mamma Roma as she moves with her son to Rome. It is clear that class is high on the agenda, and the characters we follow all occupy the lowest rung. As a former prostitute, it is almost tragic to watch as Mamma Roma tries to force her son to understand the need to climb the social ladder. Her obsession with money and what the people of Rome will be like shows us how low these characters are, for when we arrive in Rome, we find concrete towers and wasteland, but still they feel they are stepping up, away from being ‘hicks’.

Pasolini’s camera treats every scene with reverence, as though the characters inhabited the finest architecture, and operated in the upper echelons of society. His long takes, beautiful tracking shots of Mamma Roma walking her beat, chatting (or in some cases lamenting) with potential clients, show a great deal of respect for the characters, and the actors - the majority of whom were not professionals.

Every scene is shot with more attention than perhaps the situations deserve. Considering the position these characters occupy, you could be forgiven for thinking the director was overdoing things just a little. His use of classical music and the grand shots of the landscape, in particular the concrete jungle with a lone dome (symbol of hope perhaps, or the unattainable) show affection for their predicament, and, ultimately, the tragic consequences of Mamma Roma’s flawed attempts to direct her son are all the more powerful for the imagery used.

For all the artistic qualities of the director and the cinematographer, this is Mamma Roma’s film. Anna Magnani dominates every scene with sheer presence. She plays Mamma Roma as one of the great matriarchs in cinematic history, chewing her dialogue and towering over every other actor, deafening the audience with her maniacal cackle. To Ettore she is a dictator, and despite wanting only to make sure he has everything he could want, she goes too far. She sets up a local businessman for blackmail in order that Ettore can work, she asks a prostitute friend to sleep with her son to take his mind from the local tramp, Bruna, and desperately tries to shield him from her past. As with all tragedies, the past catches up, and Ettore is forced away from her by her actions and her attitude into a life of crime with the people he calls friends. This life ends badly, and the final scene of Mamma Roma being held back from an open window, staring out at the dome, past the concrete blocks, is a powerful moment.

It would be easy for such a presence as Magnani to overpower the film, and even unbalance it, but such is the power of the storytelling, the realism portrayed by the amateur cast, and the handling of the drama by Pasolini, that her presence here brings everything vividly to life.

It is at the ending that we begin to see a little more into the mind of Pasolini, as in a prison hospital we hear an ageing inmate reciting the Divine Comedy to fellow convicts. It is here that perhaps we should ask ourselves which circle of hell we have ended up in, and which ones we have travelled through to get there.


Mamma Roma is relevant, rich and beautiful. Somehow the ugliest of settings is cast in a beautiful light by Pasolini, and as an audience we feel for Mamma Roma and Ettore as they struggle on the bottom rung of society’s ladder. For fans of Pasolini’s later work, it is interesting to see where he started, and to see the difference in the ways he chooses to share his views. Before the forays into depravity, and the anger of his later works, we can see tenderness for those on the bottom. RM


REVIEW: DVD Release: Salò, Or The 120 Days Of Sodom























Film: Salò, Or The 120 Days Of Sodom
Release date: 29th September 2008
Certificate: 18
Running time: 112 mins
Director: Pier Paolo Pasolini
Starring: Paolo Bonacelli, Laura Betti, Giorgio Cataldi, Umberto Paolo Quintavalle, Aldo Valletti
Genre: Crime/Drama/Horror
Studio: BFI
Format: DVD & Blu-ray
Country: Italy/France

Salo, or 120 Days Of Sodom is possibly the most controversial film of all time - banned in almost every country since its release, it has been condemned for its graphic scenes of rape, torture and murder. Adding to its notoriety, writer and director Pier Paolo Pasolini was murdered - run over several times by his own car - shortly after its release.

Based on the book by the Marquis de Sade, it follows the tale of four perverse high-class members of society, the Duke, the Bishop, the Magistrate and the President, during Nazi occupied Italy in 1944.

After marrying one another’s daughters, they (with help of a group of militant young men and ageing prostitutes) capture and imprison nine young men and nine young women in a large mansion, forcing them to perform humiliating, degrading and debauched sexual acts.

We follow them through 120 days in four parts, starting with the aforementioned capture, before the Circle of Mania, where one of the ageing prostitutes parades around the hall, accompanied by another prostitute on piano, reminiscing about the early days of her occupation, while the four libertines, surrounded by their chosen slaves, eagerly listen to her every word, involving uneasy stories about underage prostitution.

We then enter the Circle of Shit, a truly horrific section of the film. The second ageing prostitute tells her tales of men in nappies, and the consumption of excrement.

The final part of the film, the Circle of Blood, sees the guards and slaves married in a mass wedding. Accepting their fate, the slaves begin to turn on one another, telling the libertines of rules being broken, which includes the possession of photos, prayers, inter-slave relations and going to the toilet. The wrong doers are then tortured in hideous and extreme ways, to which the masters take in turns to watch in voyeuristic fashion...



The film quickly unsettles. With about three words spoken in the opening fifteen minutes, you sense the entrapment and uneasiness the director’s portraying. Maintaining this throughout, the dialogue is scarce, but when it does arrive, it’s undeniably affecting. The prostitutes’ tales, and tirades from the masters makes for uncomfortable listening, yet, in parts, the dialogue flows almost poetically and song like, augmented by the uneasy visuals.

The acting is believable, and you feel for every one of the characters, as they are forced to bear the unbearable. During the Circle of Shit section of the film, you witness two of the most difficult scenes in cinema history. Unable to control herself, the “bride” begins sobbing. This disgusts The Duke, who strips her and throws her to the ground, unbuckling his trousers and defecating on the floor before forcing her to eat his “gift” with a spoon. This brings the film’s most infamous scene. Excited by what they have witnessed, the rest of the group demand a ‘feast’ be served that evening - three minutes of open-mouthed, look away footage, as huge platters of faeces are served to everyone, the slaves crying and balking as they eat, while the masters, their guards and prostitutes lap it up with gusto.

Standout performances come from Elsa De Giorgi and Hélène Surgère as the two prostitutes showing child-like excitement at the revolting stories they tell; their ageing faces plastered with make up giving them a ghostly appearance. Paolo Bonacelli as the Duke and Umberto Paolo Quintavalle as the Magistrate brilliantly represent the debauched element of the film, joyfully deploying human suffering and humiliation and thriving in the rape and torture of others.

Playing the part of innocence, Dori Henke puts in a strong performance as the reluctant faeces eating female slave. Although she does little more than sob, the scene where she cries for her mother and is mocked and beaten is genuinely disturbing.

The film is sometimes quite tricky to follow, with parts of the film jumping from scene to scene without warning, leaving you struggling to follow who is who and what is happening to whom. However, the film’s main strength is its ability to provoke, forcing the viewer to question beyond the events that unfold on screen - an extreme representation of power bringing corruption; the divide between social classes; and the atrocities people with power can get away with, still to this day.

It is meant to be shocking and extreme, and it is a strong and powerful film that stays with you, unable to forget what you have witnessed. You fully understand why it was (and still is) banned, yet you can’t help but appreciate its artistic merit.

Pasolini was a visionary and a bold, daring one at that. It is only fitting for a man whose whole life was surrounded by controversy that his final piece of work be his most notorious.


Art-house cinema in its truest form - and an art-house masterpiece. However, for all its brilliance, its sadistic nature makes it a one-time only viewing experience. JDU