Showing posts with label Lars von Trier. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lars von Trier. Show all posts
REVIEW: DVD Release: The Kingdom: I&II - Original Broadcast Edition
Film: The Kingdom: I&II - Original Broadcast Edition
UK Release date: 4th July 2011
Distributor: Second Sight
Certificate: 18
Running time: 573 mins
Director: Lars von Trier
Starring: Ernst-Hugo Järegård, Kirsten Rolffes, Holger Juul Hansen, Søren Pilmark, Ghita Nørby
Genre: Comedy/Drama/Fantasy/Horror/Mystery
Format: DVD
Country of Production: Denmark/France/Germany/Sweden
Language: Danish/Swedish
Review by: Rob Ward
No stranger to controversy, Lars von Trier has been delighting, appalling and surprising cinema goers for well over twenty years. He pioneered the Dogme 95 school of filmmaking, brought Bjork to the big screen and allowed his production company to produce hardcore porn. Mainstream success has not been easy to come by for von Trier, with even his biggest UK successes remaining largely ‘arthouse’. So it’s little wonder that his early career in Danish television has received little attention over here. But the release of a boxed set of supernatural hospital drama The Kingdom could be about to change that.
The Kingdom is a cutting-edge hospital staffed by an offbeat cast of characters, including a new-age director, an egotistical Swedish neurosurgeon and a reckless medical student. And their faith in science is tested as a series of supernatural episodes occurs: a ghostly young girl appears in a lift shaft; a phantom ambulance appears every night; an unnatural pregnancy affects one of the nurses and all the while a malingering patient attempts to communicate with those on the ‘other side’...
The opening credits create an instantaneous sense of intrigue. At odds with the modern hospital setting, the start of every episode features a prologue set in the misty and mysterious ‘bleaching pools’ upon which the hospital would later be built. A solemn voice narrates as the sepia toned action unfolds on screen, describing the ancient marshlands where cloth workers bleached their wares, enveloped by thick clouds of fog. It’s a simple enough scene, but slow pan of the camera and the deliberate movement of the workers on screen add certain gravity to proceedings. An air of menace and unpredictably is also evident as we are told that the building of the hospital was designed to help eradicate ignorance and superstition in favour of science. Clearly this will not be the case: the old world is literally breaking into the new.
Sadly, the impact of the credits as almost undone by the dreadful theme music which blares from the screen immediately aftermath. Perhaps a product of their time, they have not dated well at all. Like a mid-90s cop drama, they thud from the screen with the word ‘Kingdom’ repeated ad infinitum over cheesy background action. It’s woefully out of place in the midst of such an atmospherically spooky drama.
Thankfully, the director proves that he is capable of producing excellent credit sequences at the end of each episode. In an obvious homage to Alfred Hitchcock, von Trier himself appears as a presenter in dinner jacket and bow-tie as the end credits role to offer a summation of the plot and a hint at what will come in the next show. His language is quaint and antiquated as he poses rhetorical questions to the audience and occasionally mocks the actions of the characters. It’s completely unnecessary yet utterly charming - not only for von Trier’s determination to appear on the other side of the camera, but also for his geeky hand gestures, as he implores the audience to “be prepared to take the good with the evil.”
Just as The Kingdom is filed with ideas of good and evil, so it is filled with morally ambiguous (or often dubious) characters. Chief among these is Swedish neurosurgeon Stig Helmer (Ernst-Hugo Järegård). He’s a man with a whole collection of enormous chips on his shoulders – not least his utter disdain for all things Danish. Despite that, he’s played with some charm by Järegård. His aged face manages to convey just enough rumpled dissatisfaction with his incompetent colleagues to convince you that his heart is in the right place – some of the time. Despite being a fierce critic of malingerers and timewasters, he has secrets and faults of his own – not least a malpractice case arising from a botched operation which left a young girl brain-damaged.
It’s testament to the excellent writing that The Kingdom’s characters are so well-developed. It would have been very easy to rely on clichéd stereotypes in a series such as this, but each character is given room to breathe and time to develop. Some, like Helmer, arrive fully formed, others, such as his nemesis Jørgen Krogshøj (Søren Pilmark) develop more steadily. Initially, he’s little more than a sniping pedant, but he reveals himself as being rather more warm-hearted and ‘resourceful’ than he seems.
Whether the same credit can be extended as far as Sigrid Drusse (Kirsten Rolffes) is less clear. She’s the malingerer in question, inventing reasons to stay in the hospital as an excuse to carry out her paranormal investigations. Initially, she seems easy to dismiss, but as the plot unfolds her snooping becomes increasingly credible. She, however, remains irritating. Despite that, Rolffes gives a brilliant performance as the irritating old woman. One scene in particular, as Drusse attempts to speak to a ghost is an acting masterclass. With only a candle flame foregrounded and her face in the background of the frame, Drusse asks yes/no questions of the spirit world. How the flame reacts to her questioning determines what answer she has received. It’s a beautifully lit and wonderfully acted monologue – and completely compelling.
There are a whole host of other fascinating characters engaged in all manner of hare-brained schemes and storylines. A Masonic lodge rules behind the scenes, the happy-clappy hospital director attempts to introduce his hapless methods of motivation and a medical student uses a severed head to seduce a nurse. With workplace drug-dealing, a doctor transplanting a cancerous liver into himself and a pair of Down's Syndrome sufferers acting as a Greek chorus, it’s a wonder that the plot makes any sense whatsoever.
Somehow, however, it does. Von Trier has been extremely brave in throwing so many characters and so many story-strands into the mix from the very outset. Much of the success of the show lies in not underestimating its audience – each storyline is distinct and unusual enough to hold the attention and every character is interesting enough to sustain the interest. The hand-held camerawork also ensures that the viewer is constantly kept in the midst of the action. And if things ever do flag, an injection of humour is never far away.
The Kingdom is very funny – in a number of ways. There is out and out slapstick, humorous dialogue and enough absurd action to ensure that it appeals on numerous levels – and every episode contains an anti-Danish speech from Helmer (which often ends with him screaming “Danish scum” into the night sky). Often the more humorous scenes are effectively cut with the more supernatural elements to create a cohesive whole which never becomes bogged down in one particular element of the story.
Season one becomes increasingly interested in the supernatural elements of the story as it nears its conclusion, culminating in a series of cliff-hangers which are partly addressed as season two begins to unfold. It would be churlish to give too much away here about the happenings of the second series, but it’s fair to say that there are also plot points which remain unresolved as it ends. Sadly, they will remain that way. Following the climax to the series, both Ernst-Hugo Järegård and Kirsten Rolffes passed away. Shorn of arguably two of the most important characters, there was no way The Kingdom could continue and plans for a third series were shelved.
Despite the slightly unsatisfactory conclusion, The Kingdom is a simply brilliant series. It wears its influences on its sleeve proudly – clearly owing a debt to Twin Peaks and the X Files - features memorable characters and situations, and combines drama and comedy to great effect. Of course, it’s no surprise that a Danish series about the supernatural was never likely to be broadcast on TV in Britain. Instead, an inferior series (written by Steven King) attempted to replicate the appeal. Don’t bother with the remake – search out the original instead.
REVIEW: Book Release: Lars von Trier
Book: Lars von Trier
Release date: 25th April 2011
Author: Linda Badley
Publisher: University Of Illinois Press
With his visually uncomfortable and often disturbing movies, it is evident that Danish director Lars von Trier is certainly an influential character in the current artistic climate. But behind his overtly constructed media persona, and his willingly risqué presentations, it is difficult to pinpoint who exactly the real Lars von Trier is. In this short overview of his works, Linda Badley analyses his more recent films, and explores the fundamental question: is Lars von Trier a genius or a fraud?
Lars von Trier is one of the latest releases in the Contemporary Film Directors series published by the University of Illinois Press. Beginning in 2003, the series has featured critical analyses on the likes of Pedro Almodóvar, Joel and Ethan Coen and Roman Polanski. Lars von Trier explores Trier’s films in their chronological order of production, giving the reader a progressive insight into the development of an internationally acclaimed filmmaker. Badley briefly introduces his earlier short films and his conception into the art world, subsequently focusing on his more modern productions via the use of literary criticism and her own theories and analysis.
Beginning with Trier’s ascension into the role of auteur, Badley explains his desire to shape his character before he had even found a creative outlet - he assumed the ‘von’ in his name whilst studying at the Danish Film School in the early 1980s, thus aiming to construct a particular image of himself in conjunction with his work. Badley uses Trier’s own words to explain how, as a David Bowie fan, he wanted to use the same technique of creating an “entire myth” around his persona and fuse this extension of himself with his elaborate art.
Badley addresses Trier’s childhood uncertainties about his believed Jewish heritage (which was disproved on his mother’s deathbed as she revealed that she’d had an affair), his notorious tendency to abuse his female actresses into disturbingly intense performances, and the influence of early horror like The Exorcist and, more recently, Japanese horror. These various insights into the mind of the filmmaker are used to develop a legitimate and three-dimensional impression of Lars von Trier whilst also highlighting the intention behind his films…
Badley does not merely skip over details; this is a direct but abundant walkthrough of Trier’s life and artistic motives. Out of the book’s 214 pages, only 151 are allocated to Badley’s critique of Trier - the remainder is filled with notes, indexes and two interviews with the director himself. In such a small space, Badley manages to intricately investigate his films, touching on the development of Trier himself as a person and as a performance. There are endless opportunities for thorough discussions on such a distinctive character, and yet Lars von Trier is wonderfully concise. Badley seems to pick out the absolutely necessary ideas and build them into an invaluable outline of his entire career; you can open the book at any page and instantly land upon a fascinating perspective or debate.
Each chapter is freighted with plenty of valuable quotes; there is a constant connection to Trier’s own viewpoint and ideas. Films are discussed within allocated sections, marking a clear path through the director’s professional journey. Badley highlights areas where Trier’s style and ethics both overlap and develop: from his transition to focusing on the female in Breaking The Waves (1996) up to his now expected inducement of actress distress by the time of Antichrist (2009), and his regular adoption of a perpetually bleak and stark visual palette.
Literary criticism is used to analyse the theoretical aspects of Trier’s work; such as discussions in the fields of gender relations and religion, the psychoanalytical approach to assessing the role of the suffering female, and the influence of Nietzsche on Trier (particularly the title choice of Trier’s Antichrist, having kept a copy of Nietzsche’s The Antichrist with him since the age of 12). As Trier is intrinsically linked to repression and exploitation of the female role, it is uplifting to see his choices explained through his own words. He is not the sadist he is socially understood to be; Trier is in fact projecting these women as metaphorical self-portraits, not as real people. The informality and openness of the included interviews with Trier are useful in questioning the rumours of brutality in his creativity.
Trier’s prolific supply of emotional distress is observed rather than attacked, presenting an unbiased critique of his style. Chapters are organised with clarity, followed by a useful filmography and a clearly presented index. The book is aimed at scholars; it is not a light read, and it is linguistically sophisticated. However, the content itself is extremely interesting and informative, rendering it appropriate for an audience outside media students and other authors.
Linda Badley provides a succinct exploration of the Lars von Trier catalogue, omitting a ‘conclusion’ chapter in order to let the individual film analyses speak for themselves. ‘Genius or fraud?’ becomes irrelevant after reading of Trier’s ambitious ideas and challenging persona, not to mention his various awards. Anybody wanting to see deeper into the eyes of a modern cinema icon will definitely have something to gain from reading Lars von Trier. NM
SPECIAL FEATURE: DVD Review: Dancer In The Dark
Film: Dancer In The Dark
Release date: 17th September 2007
Certificate: 15
Running time: 134 mins
Director: Lars von Trier
Starring: Bjork, Catherine Deneuve, David Morse, Udo Kier, Peter Stormare
Genre: Musical/Drama
Studio: Film4
Country: Denmark/Germany/Netherlands
This is an English-language title.
“Emotional pornography”: that’s how Bjork labelled von Trier and his methods after collaborating with him to make Dancer In The Dark. The film may not be as intrepid as his more recent Antichrist, or as controversial as The Idiots, but those emotionally pornographic moments won von Trier the Palme d’Or at 2000’s Cannes and earned Bjork her own award in recognition of the poignant performance von Trier drew from her.
The Icelandic singer plays a Czech mother settled in Washington State with her 12-year-old son. Selma is hard-working but destitute, and the two of them live in a caravan at the bottom of their landlord’s garden. Selma pays her way by working in a dreary factory by day, and eventually by night as well.
Whilst things are far from rosy for the single parent family, there is nothing particularly remarkable about them either. Selma is shy and inoffensive, and faces the same challenges any mother does. Gene’s birthday is coming up, for instance, and it’s no surprise that he asks for a bicycle. Already an outcast amongst his classmates, he simply wants to fit in with his peers like any school boy. Selma desperately tries to make him understand that she simply cannot afford it, but when her policeman landlord treats Gene to his dream birthday present, she naturally expresses an awkwardness that we may well empathise with. Aside from the unwanted interest of Jeff, Selma has very little to break the monotony of life, and this is why she turns to the fantastical musical numbers that are scattered throughout the film.
The motivation for Selma’s relocation is revealed a little later in the film and it immediately pulls at the heart strings. The true meaning behind Selma’s work ethic lies with her son, who is destined to lose his sight, just as Selma herself does over the course of the film. Only in America can an operation be performed to prevent the illness from progressing in the blissfully ignorant Gene, who has been protected from the truth by Selma. The money that she has worked so hard to earn is stashed away for the operation, but her fading vision means that she unknowingly loses it, and her son faces the same fate as her.
Determined to save her son at any cost, Selma is intent on finding her money. When she discovers the perpetrator, a familiar acquaintance who should know better, she stops at nothing to get her funds back. Her actions lead to a clash with the law, and she eventually faces the ultimate dilemma: her life or her son’s health…
Not the most obvious choice of story for a musical, Dancer In The Dark manages to mix heartbreak with song and dance. Whilst the majority of the film is shot in von Trier’s typical grainy, handheld style, with extended use of close-ups and lengthy dialogue, the musical numbers are an effort to break from the director’s usual aesthetic and experiment with Hollywood.
The very reason the film works as a musical is the sentimental sense of escapism offered to Selma through these vibrant numbers. Accusations of von Trier’s anti-American bias may be valid in other parts of the film, but these musical moments are a conscious acknowledgement to Hollywood’s Golden Age. Von Trier also draws from operas of the past and in interviews, such as the one included in this DVD release, he has referred to the profound impact they used to have on audiences. This is what he wanted to recreate with Dancer In The Dark, and this is what he accomplished. When the story plods past the introductory phase and picks up in the latter half, emotions heighten and an almost unbearably tense climax is reached.
Although Bjork has cleared up any rumours that she is yet another singer-turned-actress wannabe, her award was well-deserved. She presents us with a character so honest and endearing that the viewer cannot help but root for her throughout the entire film, even in those very human moments where her sheer stubbornness prevails. After all, that stubbornness is not for nothing: it is a symptom of her determination and devotion to her son. Supported by a cast of naturalistic actors who are clearly comfortable delivering performances about real life using improvised dialogue, Bjork gives a fantastic representation of a struggling, but single-minded woman.
A harrowing film about the lengths a mother will go to for the sake of her son, Dancer In The Dark is an experience that no one is likely to forget in a hurry. Hindsight is a wonderful thing, but with its benefits, it is safe to say that it certainly was worth risking Zentropa studios to make this masterpiece. Don’t expect to come away dry eyed. RS
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






